Did vietnam, korea and every other war since the crusades, and leading up till now, work out exactly as planned? yes
The reason the answer is yes, is because all wars are planned and instigated by, and for the original anti-Christ gang, and their goyim-helper dupes. The short term as well as the long term goals are always for the tiny parasitical oligarchal class whose name must never be mentioned, or they will turn their Anti-Christ consciousness against you as being anti-them.
Until you accept and appreciate that you will continue to analyze and pontificate on the wrong enemy forces, both foreign and domestic.
Mmmh, this is good piece of tactical analysis, but I still believe that the main strategy is to lure Russia into a trap by occupying large parts of territory of Ucraine. The more territory Russia occupies the more it will have to defend. Not defending to an infantry which would be easy but defending the occupied territories against continuous attacks of missiles fired from far away against the Russians positions. The only way of defense are sophisticated ballistic missile defense systems. And so Russia will have to install hundreds of these systems to defend the occupied territories: Bdm systems which are needed first of all to defend their nuclear missiles sites against a nuclear first strike. So the strategy has been always the same: diverting attention and firepower to launch a surprise nuclear first strike against the Russian nuclear missiles sites.
Did WW1 & 2 work out as planned? yes
Did vietnam, korea and every other war since the crusades, and leading up till now, work out exactly as planned? yes
The reason the answer is yes, is because all wars are planned and instigated by, and for the original anti-Christ gang, and their goyim-helper dupes. The short term as well as the long term goals are always for the tiny parasitical oligarchal class whose name must never be mentioned, or they will turn their Anti-Christ consciousness against you as being anti-them.
Until you accept and appreciate that you will continue to analyze and pontificate on the wrong enemy forces, both foreign and domestic.
That is unless you are a super dupe yourself.
Mmmh, this is good piece of tactical analysis, but I still believe that the main strategy is to lure Russia into a trap by occupying large parts of territory of Ucraine. The more territory Russia occupies the more it will have to defend. Not defending to an infantry which would be easy but defending the occupied territories against continuous attacks of missiles fired from far away against the Russians positions. The only way of defense are sophisticated ballistic missile defense systems. And so Russia will have to install hundreds of these systems to defend the occupied territories: Bdm systems which are needed first of all to defend their nuclear missiles sites against a nuclear first strike. So the strategy has been always the same: diverting attention and firepower to launch a surprise nuclear first strike against the Russian nuclear missiles sites.