Sometimes it's people's virtue and non-judgment of people that gets them into trouble. We are always told to be nice. Eff that. Sometimes it's best to be judgy and picky.
Good people who are unfortunate in the looks department - their loveliness will shine through.
This person and his troll lady give off a feeling of idle, unproductive, non-caring for themselves or others. Who would invest their money with someone who can't put on a clean pair of underwear?
It's the post-modern revolt against aesthetics and objective reality.
And yeah they're shameless criminals who seem to be at an intersection of every corrupt and ridiculous thing in our society. They're is no reason these horrible people should be treated with decency, and if anyone wants a puff piece the NYT already provided that.
His dick probably doesnt work from all the amphetamines
And yeah this has been my best performin article in the first 24 hours outside of times I got a lucky retweet from a large account. The public yearns for commentary on her ugliness. I was back and forth on writing this but my friend was correct that it would do well because no one else will touch the topic.
Of course there have been memes and shitposters talking about it, but no in depth writing.
The Soros-backed globalist ideology that fueled FTX is about anti-humanism pure and simple. For this ideology to work, they need people to suppress their basic human instincts. My first instinct upon seeing that photo of Ellison (they all pretty much used the same one) was: WTF is that? They want us to ignore and suppress that normal reaction, to make us feel ashamed as being "mean" or "superficial." But by noticing and calling out her ugliness, you were simply being human--and undermining their anti-human agenda in the process.
This is similar to why Caitlin Johnstone is intentionally profane. These monster imperialist war criminals will advocate for bombing indiscriminately then demand you act respectfully towards them and maintain "decorum." It's bullshit.
People who tried to buy all the power in our society to do awful things to us based on fake altruism and stole billions of dollars potentially triggering a widespread financial crisis absolutely do not deserve politeness or sympathy.
Thanks for motivating me to catch me up on this story! I was travelling and somehow managed to miss the whole thing. The article at Brownstone about how this bad actor also funded bogus COVID research is worth checking out. These Ponzi schemes never cease to amaze me... and the gullibility of those ensnared. I am truly amazed by the ramifying networks of complicity in this case.
FWIW: I am not really interested in how these people look or dress.
I actually think the appearance and dress is somewhat key to how they scammed this specific group of people who are in a revolt against aesthetics and objective reality, but I have long been fascinated by the way this segment will intentionally uglify themselves, I dont really see it as different from horrible modern art, which incidentally is also a money laundering scam.
And yeah its incredible the extent to which everything ridiculous and corrupt in our society intersects at this one story.
Just something my dad always told me when growing up, you can criticize anything but looks. But of course in my head I’m laughing at your descriptions. But my dads voice is tsk tsking me
In this instance I think its relevant both because being attractive is usually part of running a con, but more importantly because there is a revolt against beauty and he is from the social milieu that wants is to believe Kamala Hariss's stepdaughter is a fashion icon.
Don’t make fun of someone’s looks no matter how odious they are, it reflects poorly on you. There are so many other things to criticize in these characters, but people can’t escape the face they’re born with.
Hilarious article. And spot on.
Sometimes it's people's virtue and non-judgment of people that gets them into trouble. We are always told to be nice. Eff that. Sometimes it's best to be judgy and picky.
Good people who are unfortunate in the looks department - their loveliness will shine through.
This person and his troll lady give off a feeling of idle, unproductive, non-caring for themselves or others. Who would invest their money with someone who can't put on a clean pair of underwear?
It's the post-modern revolt against aesthetics and objective reality.
And yeah they're shameless criminals who seem to be at an intersection of every corrupt and ridiculous thing in our society. They're is no reason these horrible people should be treated with decency, and if anyone wants a puff piece the NYT already provided that.
In this case, I think her ugliness (inside and out) is relevant. I’m glad someone finally mentioned it.
For the record, I call bullshit that SBF is having sex with anyone.
His dick probably doesnt work from all the amphetamines
And yeah this has been my best performin article in the first 24 hours outside of times I got a lucky retweet from a large account. The public yearns for commentary on her ugliness. I was back and forth on writing this but my friend was correct that it would do well because no one else will touch the topic.
Of course there have been memes and shitposters talking about it, but no in depth writing.
The Soros-backed globalist ideology that fueled FTX is about anti-humanism pure and simple. For this ideology to work, they need people to suppress their basic human instincts. My first instinct upon seeing that photo of Ellison (they all pretty much used the same one) was: WTF is that? They want us to ignore and suppress that normal reaction, to make us feel ashamed as being "mean" or "superficial." But by noticing and calling out her ugliness, you were simply being human--and undermining their anti-human agenda in the process.
This is similar to why Caitlin Johnstone is intentionally profane. These monster imperialist war criminals will advocate for bombing indiscriminately then demand you act respectfully towards them and maintain "decorum." It's bullshit.
People who tried to buy all the power in our society to do awful things to us based on fake altruism and stole billions of dollars potentially triggering a widespread financial crisis absolutely do not deserve politeness or sympathy.
Thanks for motivating me to catch me up on this story! I was travelling and somehow managed to miss the whole thing. The article at Brownstone about how this bad actor also funded bogus COVID research is worth checking out. These Ponzi schemes never cease to amaze me... and the gullibility of those ensnared. I am truly amazed by the ramifying networks of complicity in this case.
FWIW: I am not really interested in how these people look or dress.
I actually think the appearance and dress is somewhat key to how they scammed this specific group of people who are in a revolt against aesthetics and objective reality, but I have long been fascinated by the way this segment will intentionally uglify themselves, I dont really see it as different from horrible modern art, which incidentally is also a money laundering scam.
And yeah its incredible the extent to which everything ridiculous and corrupt in our society intersects at this one story.
a propos of modern art:
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls048636974/
Just something my dad always told me when growing up, you can criticize anything but looks. But of course in my head I’m laughing at your descriptions. But my dads voice is tsk tsking me
In this instance I think its relevant both because being attractive is usually part of running a con, but more importantly because there is a revolt against beauty and he is from the social milieu that wants is to believe Kamala Hariss's stepdaughter is a fashion icon.
Don’t make fun of someone’s looks no matter how odious they are, it reflects poorly on you. There are so many other things to criticize in these characters, but people can’t escape the face they’re born with.
With the amount of resources they had until recently that is quite literally untrue.
Is it making fun of it or sharing objective facts with colorful wording?