I was reminded of the Foreign Policy article cited here and had cause to come looking back for it, and noticed that the author is, "Alex Galitsky, program director of the Armenian National Committee of America in Washington." It was a big mistake and very uncharacteristic of me that I don't seem to have noticed that at the time and referred to the Foreign Policy article as "surprisingly balanced" when obviously it's extremely slanted against Azerbaijan.
My point was that it is surprisingly fair about Russia's role in the country.
Excellent work on this.
Extremely distressful conclusion. Armenia will find a way through like a sugar cane will bend but will not break!
I was reminded of the Foreign Policy article cited here and had cause to come looking back for it, and noticed that the author is, "Alex Galitsky, program director of the Armenian National Committee of America in Washington." It was a big mistake and very uncharacteristic of me that I don't seem to have noticed that at the time and referred to the Foreign Policy article as "surprisingly balanced" when obviously it's extremely slanted against Azerbaijan.
My point was that it is surprisingly fair about Russia's role in the country.
Without Armenia, NATO cannot fully penetrate the Caucasus.
End of story.
Understand?